Info message
Successful operation message
Warning message
Error message

nark

67 comments · +1,127 / −161 · rank #1022 of 40,276

Time for Kempthorne, King and co to fall on their swords, and resign. They wont have a show of re-election next year!The report to TDC said they identified 18 options for water, but only considered four. Now the Council should seriously look at the other alternatives.

+61−13

Nelson Pine Industries are a good example of water wastage. They are obviously running an exothermic reaction that requires tons of water for cooling. You can see tons of water in the form of steam continuously disappearing into the atmosphere. Why dont they condense this steam back to water and recycle it? Another question is how safe is their plant. NPI is owned by Japanese. Do we want foreigners dictating to us to build a dam?

+38−4

If either Hawkes or Sangster change their vote it will be 7:7 and Two Vote Kempthorne will get his way. That will incur ratepayers a lot of legal expense to get a Judicial Review of the process!

+28−3

Cancel all irrigation rights and there will be no shortages. Recent council report stated that many irrigators are grossly exceeding their allocation. Cancel them first!

+25−1

Sir Geoffrey Palmer said decisions can be revisited. Too right they can! You can be sure that next year, when there is a new council (without Two Votes and his mates), the decision in favour of a dam will be reversed. Construction is unlikely to have started by next October as all the anticipated legal challenges will still be dragging on.

+35−11

There are more acceptable alternatives which Kempthorne, King and co refuse to consider. These include MAR (managed aquifer replenishment), pipeing down the old railway route from the lakes, serial low weirs, etc., etc..The reason there is a shortage of water is that TDC have already allocated more water for irrigation than is available. Ban irrigation and problem fixed. Let the farmers turn to dry-land farming.

+31−7

This Extraordinary meeting of Council has been called at short notice. The addenda can be found on TDC website under Council Meetings. The PUBLIC will be EXCLUDED for the Waimea Dam item. This stinks! I trust any councillors unable to attend will be allowed to vote by phone, as in the past.

+25−3

Cam the Town Clerk please explain why council officers identified 18 different options for water augmentation, but only considered four, and only gave councillors financials for the dam option? Why were councillors not given cost/benefit data for all 18 options? Who is running TDC - the councillors or the civil servants?

+21−2

Take note Jacinda, youve lost my Party Vote. And, Damian, I wont be voting for you either.Do the majority of politicians understand the Nicks bill will require urban ratepayers to subsidise a few farmers? NZ gave up agricultural subsidies decades ago.Good on the Greens for taking a stand and listening to the majority of Tasman ratepayers.

+21−4

Time for Kempthorne, King and co to fall on their swords, and resign. They wont have a show of re-election next year!The report to TDC said they identified 18 options for water, but only considered four. Now the Council should seriously look at the other alternatives.

+22−5

Sir Geoffrey Palmer said decisions can be revisited. Too right they can! If TDC go ahead with the dam you can be sure that next year, when there is a new council (without Two Votes and his mates),any decision in favour of a dam will be reversed. Construction is unlikely to have started by next October as all the anticipated legal challenges will still be dragging on.

+16−1

NPI should start by conserving water. Every day they are putting tons of steam into the atmosphere. They are on the shore and could easily use treated saltwater for their industrial purposes. Alternatively, they can use recycled water - places like London and Singapore have recycled water out of their taps - ours is wasted on Rabbit Island.The fact that NPI are foreign owned does not impress me!

+15−1

There are better alternatives to the dam, such as Managed Aquifer Replenishment, as used in Canterbury, Holland, Arizona, etc.. One pumps water underground in the wet season and pumps it back up when it is dry. The total volume of the known aquifers under the Waimea Plain is over 80million cubic meters - the proposed dam is only 12 million! The operating costs may be a bit higher, but the capital cost will be less.

+15−2

Could it be the Japanese owners of Nelson Pine Ind? Or is it Fonterra? If the latter we can expect the Waimea River to be a disaster zone. A dry river bed in winter when then are building up supplies for Summer irrigation - and the river will be polluted with dairy run off. All to make a few farmers rich at ratepayers expense. We gave up agricultural subsidies in the 1980s!

+14−1

TDC Council need a restructure. My experience of other councils is that the issues are developed in Sub-committees, which then report to the full Council a couple of weeks later for confirmation or amendment. The Press reports of Sub-committee business gives the public a chance to state their views before the Council meeting. In TDC, all councillors are on the major Committees and binding decisions are made there, without a public airing.

+12−0

Councillors heard a international consultant engineer who is based in Moutere submit that dam was not safe and that cost could double. TDC will go broke over this and all the councillors will be sacked. Then the government will force amalgamation with Nelson and Nelson ratepayers will have to pay off the TDC debt!

+14−2

TDC will go broke, either when people dont pay their rates, or when cost over-runs from the dam hit. Either way, the government could appoint a Commissioner to run the district, or force amalgamation with Nelson. In the latter case, Nelson will have to settle TDCs debts.

+11−0

Time to reorganise TDC. Other councils Ive dealt with do the detail work in Sub-committees, possibly if closed session if it is commercially sensitive. Their recommendations go in a report to full council a couple of weeks later. This may be taken up by the press so is known to the public. The full council have time to read the report and can then adopt, amend or reject the subcommittees recommendations.

+11−1

When one flies over the region one can see all the small, privately owned, irrigation ponds that forward thinking farmers and orchardists created at their own expense many years ago. Let those who want the dam do this.In the TDC environment committee last month it was reported that 23 parties grossly exceeded the amount of water they were permitted to take. What Are TDC doing about this?Also, what about the Council officers who over allocated the available water for irrigation. Have they been sacked?

+10−0

It has not been proven that water will percolate from the dam to the aquifers. Most dams silt up, and when this happens, no water will reach the aquifers. Then the likely outcome is that they will have to pump the water underground. They could do that now. Pump water into the huge aquifers in the wet season and pump it back up when it is dry. This is Managed Aquifer Replenishment, as done in Canterbury, Holland, Arizona, etc.

+11−2

The whole business of the dam stinks. Hopefully Kempthorne, King and the other supporters will be ousted in next years local body elections. We ratepayers, as well as the councillors, need to know what is going on behind the scenes - I dont trust the Council officers. What is the total cost going to be? Who will pay for the over-runs? NZ agave up agricultural subsidies. Years ago. This dam will be a backward step.

+8−0

Not only third world countries are worse. Just back from France. In rural areas some toilets still just have a starting blocks and a hole in the floor. Where there is a toilet as we know it, there is no guarantee of a seat or paper or a door. The old open-to-view pissoire are now rare.

+6−0

If the dam goes ahead you can expect TDC to go broke. Then the government will force the amalgamation with Nelson. How will Nelson ratepayers like to be saddled with Tasman debts

+4−1

Staker, do your homework! Read the report to the August Coincil meeting (Google: tdc council meetings). 18 options have been identified, but only the dam and two others given any consideration. If they looked at Managed Aquifer Replenishment, as done in Canterbury, Holland and Arizona, they wouldnt need a dam. The known aquifers total over 80 million cubic meters - the dam would only be 12!

+1−0

2 days agoNarkI was a customer of National Bank for nearly 50 years till ANZ took them over. Services have steadily declined since then. Time for me to look for a new bank!Keith Holysmoke was a Motueka man. He must be turning in his grave over this. John Key is chairman of ANZs NZ board. Shame on him for letting this happen!

+0−0