Info message
Successful operation message
Warning message
Error message

Brokenarrow

472 comments · +8,605 / −2,024 · rank #21 of 40,276

Greg OConnor is 100% right about the Claire Curran affair, the PM handled it badly, in fact she hardly managed it at all. Poor leadership from the PM and Ive heard all sorts of excuses this week for her. Just do the job youre paid for PM and I dont mean Winston.

+140−8

So let me get this right, she showed decisive leadership on the oil and gas decision presumably because of climate change and carbon emissions then takes a solo flight in a 737 while everyone else travelled together on a separate flight. A very bad look and the Green party silence is deafening. Hypocrites the lot of them.

+59−7

look at the packed motorways every morning. People going to work to pay bills, mortgages, rent, tax etc etc. All these homeless have made choices along the way in their lives that have put them on the street. Went up Albert Street on Friday and people sleeping on seats while everybody around them works. Yes after 35 years of paying tax Im losing sympathy for all the excuses like drug addiction and mental health issues. Just saying.

+52−11

We know how to vote in the next Auckland City Council elections. We dont need big rate increases every year if we got rid of the millions going to endless consultants. Just like the current government is doing , paying other people to do what council staff are already paid to do, their jobs.

+38−1

Qatar Airways boss says his job can only be done by a man and their is gasps and groans from the audience. Theresa Gattung says Fletcher Construction wouldnt be in a poor financial state if a woman had been in charge and she gets applause. Nothing subtle about the sexism displayed here.

+41−6

This is a great way to lose respect for woman appointed to boards in the future. They will be tainted by people not knowing if theyre appointed on merit or token representatives. Not a good look for woman. Is the Womans Minister pushed up the list on merit or on her gender. I suspect that it is the latter after some of her past comments.

+33−2

Why didnt they just stay over 500 metres to the side of the ship and they could have legally protested for weeks or months. They made a decision to get in front of the vessel and commit an offence and put themselves at risk and the ships crew. What if one of the Greenpeace boats broke down and couldnt retrieve them from the water? By the way the Greenpeace vessels, 4 in total would have used hundreds of litres of fuel on their anti oil excursion.

+25−2

Why do we want a politician as PM that cant answer a straight question with a straight answer. He treats the NZ tax paying public as idiots, and I can see why as who in their right mind would want him in this position.

+38−16