Info message
Successful operation message
Warning message
Error message

samf

23 comments · +258 / −164 · rank #8152 of 40,276

Move the whole business of vehicle inspections back to the Ministry of Transport and isolate the garages from the business. As it stands, the system is corrupt to the core. For example, a garage that is overwhelmed with current repair work will be unlikely to find much wrong with a vehicle at WOF. On the other hand, a garage that has no work on, will find all manner of things wrong on WOF and thus the WOF license is actually a license to generate work.I say the two functions really need to be isolated and vehicle testing stations that were run by the MOT need to be reinstated.

+38−10

$100m would be conservative. Try $165m. What cost for weirs I asked as public meeting? Result was a firm shut up and stop revisiting the past from Palmer and Kempthorne. And they call this a transparetn and democratic process..... Tui time.

+17−2

Exactly. And given that the total irrigation water take has been falling for the last 10 years, why is this problem being blamed on the irrigators? How about looking in detail at the amount of consented urban expansion and the massive level of development fees collected from them? Thats where the problem has been created (that is - if there even is a problem).

+15−4

Reviews, enquiries, investigations, terms of reference, and so it goes on. Even when faults, causes and outcomes are clarified, who will actually be held accountable for the outright abuse of ratepayers cash? Will the responsible NCC employees be booted? Or will these debacles continue happening unchecked? Methinks Yes they will.

+3−4

So you say but if I was a patient, Id prefer a UK trained Theatre tech any day of the week. You seem to be subverting my comment with a distraction and if you are implying that their theatres are filfthy then you are ignorant. Ive spent anough years working inside them (not as a Theatre Tech I would add) to say that their hygeine standards are as good as anywhere in the world.

+0−2

Youre all missing the point. The Drs position is 100% clear - his primary obligation is to public safety and his secondary obligation is to the rights/condition of his patient. In this case, there was no public safety issue and the condition of his patient was therefore paramount. If a Dr were to breach that trust, then the Dr/patient relationships all over the world would break down. Providing good quality care is based on a huge level of trust between the two and if that is gone then no Dr would be safely able to provide healthcare.

+1−4

Its not rot. If there is not 100% confidence that anything you tell the Dr will not be repeated, how many people will disclose details about their condition in order to receive the correct treatment. Full and frank disclosure is vital in the diagnosis of many conditions.

+1−5

Absolutely no doubt that the Drs have done the correct thing - if they hadnt then the Dr/Patient trust in numerous other cases would fail. Having that trust is crucial to providing good healthcare. I was always taught by the worlds best ethical minds that the only time you break confidence is when doing so will prevent harm to another person (not property). In this case that is/was impossible. They have done the right thing.

+14−68