Info message
Successful operation message
Warning message
Error message

nexttime

438 comments · +4,083 / −2,925 · rank #813 of 40,276

Its not just about a uniform. Its about an organised group whose sole purpose is anti social and criminal. Why do we allow then to exist, let alone condone them and support them financially through benefits? Would we do that if it was an ISIS group, or a bunch of known paedophiles? Just ban them and ignore the bleating hand wringers over human rights. Why are their rights so much greater than the rights of citizens to live without being intimidated or subject to the effects of their drug trade? Ban them outright.

+150−7

Recently in Brisbane - regular unleaded $1.45.9 per litre, occasionally on special at $1.35.9. â˜Economies of scale everyone will shout. Yeah right, Ive got a good idea of international business and the fuel industry overseas, and that is very unlikely to account for 84 cents a litre. The tax difference is about 32 cents a litre. The rest is greed and exploitation.

+38−3

When someone who can dance, like Suzy, goes and someone who patently cannot, like David, stays you realise what a mockery ˜Dancing' with the stars is - it has nothing to do with dancing, everything to do with marshalling votes. And that's something even a secondary politician like Seymour is practised at. As a dance competition it's a joke

+47−15

Quite clearly it has spread. If it hadnt there would be a clear and measurable gap between Auckland and the rest. But there is so much obfuscation in the â˜the Gull factor or â˜the national price or â˜the Wellington price that the fuel companies can gleefully do what they like and screw the price wherever and whenever they like. And that great â˜kiwi company Z is the worst. Any economist worth their salt should be able to do a simple margin calculation and inform the public about how the public is being screwed by these leeches on society now versus one year ago, two years ago, three years ago etc. Id love to see a coordinated public response that systematically boycotted each supplier for a month or more in turn, youd soon see some response. But New Zealanders are too complacent and too willing to be exploited.

+32−1

Cant go anything about it a) no one owns it so everyone does and b) our great trade agreements mean we cant stop any of our trading partners from taking it. The big question is why do we always come off so bad in trade agreements and give this kind of thing away without reciprocal rights. Both governments are as bad st it as each other - the thing is that the Nats think theyre such great business people and negotiators. Couldnt negotiate their way through an open door

+31−5

Thats New Zealand for you. And when that happens we get commentators like this one praising them for getting their own way and not facing up to their own inadequacies. I wonder how many of them - including the author - know the meaning of the word â˜manipulative!

+26−1

Grosser proved his incompetence with his inability to negotiate the TPPA deal anywhere near as good as Australia got. Something the Labour government achieved within weeks.

+44−22

Not so easy any more, there is no doubt that Kiwis are treated as second class citizens in many ways in Australia - and I talk from experience. However that doesnt detract from the reality of this story - that NZ isnt what it used to be and is becoming unaffordable and â˜just not worth it for many. Mainly through the greed of those who have the ability to exercise a monopoly for our dollar - think supermarkets, petrol companies, electricity companies, landlords. If they were not so greedy and what they supply was reasonably priced, wed be the best country again. But greed rules now, and you must pay, and so NZ declines

+18−1

Jonathanman - check your facts - unemployment was last at this level in 2014, 4% GDP growth is a one off due to the tax credit to the rich. Peace in Korea? You mean the great delusion because Kim stared down Trump and has kept his nuclear arsenal?

+19−3

Cant help thinking this is a bit like the nurses. What started out as genuine issues and reasonable expectations has now become something much more akin to opportunism and greed. Losing my respect and support fast.

+19−6

Im intrigued that there are no comments regarding how the vote went against it because of the funding balance, then when the whatsit hits the fan and they dont get their way, the commercial people can suddenly - and secretly - find more money? Surely proof that they were trying to rip off the ratepayer and not pay what they obviously now accept as their share! And you have to ask if there would have been a second vote allowed, in order to reverse it, if the vote had initially been in favour - or like now for instance? What if new info comes to light about the cost or the funding - will it be another vote? I bet not...

+12−2

Really interesting way of seeing the world, Haymaker. I - and many others - would argue that the world is far from unified, in fact it is as divided and close to war as ever, been has so much been spent by so many on rearming and building up armed forces? Forced left and right have never been so polarised - and no more so than in the US itself. Fewer terrorist attacks? Surely depends on where youre looking? The people in Europe, Gaza, Libya and Baghdad probably havent noticed any decline. Have the American people noticed any reduction in mass shootings, or overall shooting of Americans by Americans? And if Trump is â˜getting the job done then I, for one, have never understood the job description of the American presidency.

+10−0

You completely miss the point - it used to be that even those on low incomes in NZ could afford to skiing, and grab a snack up there, and that was before modern methods of looking after and preparing food. And before the current greed, which has made skiing in NZ elitist and unaffordable

+11−2

Yes please - examples would be good. Please start with no gun licence required for 12000 Americans a year to be shot by their fellow Americans. And then touch on health... now, over to you

+9−0

If any of the unthinking Trump acolytes criticising the UN here as being ineffective had any kind of real knowledge theyd know that the UN has fulfilled its main objective of preventing another world war on several occasions. It has also achieved huge things in world health and child and refugee protection. But theyre all things that Donald and his little cronies dont care about.

+21−13

The issue is several layers deep, but fundamentally quite simple. Trump removed a lot of the safeguards that were attempted to be put in place. This was emulated elsewhere by those who needed to keep engaged with American money. This left the way open for new and exciting investment tools for the big players. These players had, in fact, learned something from 2008, and that is how to distance themselves further from their own liability, as is explained in the article. The third thing is that many corporates and individuals made so much money from the last crash that theyre very keen to do it again. And the ridiculous lack of controls by government agencies and leaders is helping them to do just that.

+14−6