Crikey, they havent even kicked off yet and you already know whats going to happen! Got Saturdays Lotto numbers too?
why is it so laughable? Hansen has to try keep a 16 year Bledisloe winning side (or whatever it is) interested...
ABs will be favourites but only 60/40. The home advantage is huge and Aussies tough series v Ireland was a much better warm up than our easy series win v France. ABs were a bit lucky to steal the second test in Dunedin last year and as Paul Cully noted in his SMH article ...Take away the first half of last years opening Bledisloe Test in Sydney, when the Wallabies were asleep, and Australia outscored New Zealand over the next five halves of the Bledisloe series by 80-67. With the 3rd test in Japan this year (instead of NZ) Aussie will know if they can get this first test they have a real chance of winning the Bledisloe. Will be huge, but Ill go ABs 1-10.
It is such a laughably dumb thing for Hansen to say. A quick look on TAB shows the all blacks are $1.19 favourites...!
yes
We are 1.19 at the TAB. That aint an underdog.
Yep Peyper. All the refs have been appointed. https://rugbyreferee.net/2018/07/12/rugby-championship-2018-match-officials-announced/
âThough Ive never seen a howler actually cost a team a test match win.âDid watch the 3rd test against the Lions then?
geez bud are you crystal ballin or what?..your glass is way less than half empty!
chicken counter dont be fella
I agree with everything especially Saveas blunder but with all that said there was most definitely a refereeing howler (on FT) that cost us the game
Not dumb or laughable. The last time time we played Australia they beat us over there and the game before that in Dundein, we only tipped them up in the last minute.
Dont be silly, its an 80 minute, there are many ways to win, one is exerting so much pressure on the opposition the commit a foul, your fair reward is a penalty. The opportunity was denied.
you have some crazy logic dude
The only reason the All Blacks are $1.19 is the bookies are too afraid to frame an honest market. If the game was played 100 times the bookies are stating that the All Blacks should win 84.3 of them and anyone with half a brain would know that based on the 161 test matches played, Australia have a 31.07% chance of winning - that is the 1 implied probability. So for the less educated on here who believe that the TAB odds are indicative of honest favouritism think again. And dont forget, these crooks have framed their markets to their advantage and only want to give you as little of their money as possible for any All Blacks victory. The 1 value is all with Australia as far as betting is concerned and the All Blacks are way over the odds and not a value bet at all. If betting on this game I know where my $100 would be going.
Wallabies are a better chance than 1.19. Cheika & Thorn have installed some real steel and the raw material is there with Coleman,Rodda & Arnold. Previously, the aussies didnt have any decent locks since Eales. When he was there they were regular winners.Expect forward battle to be quite even, but with Pocock giving an edge in fetching. In the backs they have weaknesses at centre (injuries) and left wing (defence) and are heavily reliant on Beale & Folau on attack.
Pete Samu came off the bench in the final...
Theyre better because of the coach.
Thanks for the laugh ha ha! Theyre better because they all have a stronger individual work ethic and are mostly naturals at working in a team and mostly level-headed, hence why they are better. Both teams have awful coaches. You could coach the All Blacks and I guarantee that youd be receiving the same compliments as Shag because the results wouldnt be any different.
Look at samu. A wallaby who cant make the best match day 23 for one of of our super rugby sides. We should put 30points + on them.
Crikey, they havent even kicked off yet and you already know whats going to happen! Got Saturdays Lotto numbers too?
why is it so laughable? Hansen has to try keep a 16 year Bledisloe winning side (or whatever it is) interested...
ABs will be favourites but only 60/40. The home advantage is huge and Aussies tough series v Ireland was a much better warm up than our easy series win v France. ABs were a bit lucky to steal the second test in Dunedin last year and as Paul Cully noted in his SMH article ...Take away the first half of last years opening Bledisloe Test in Sydney, when the Wallabies were asleep, and Australia outscored New Zealand over the next five halves of the Bledisloe series by 80-67. With the 3rd test in Japan this year (instead of NZ) Aussie will know if they can get this first test they have a real chance of winning the Bledisloe. Will be huge, but Ill go ABs 1-10.
It is such a laughably dumb thing for Hansen to say. A quick look on TAB shows the all blacks are $1.19 favourites...!
yes
We are 1.19 at the TAB. That aint an underdog.
Yep Peyper. All the refs have been appointed. https://rugbyreferee.net/2018/07/12/rugby-championship-2018-match-officials-announced/
âThough Ive never seen a howler actually cost a team a test match win.âDid watch the 3rd test against the Lions then?
geez bud are you crystal ballin or what?..your glass is way less than half empty!
chicken counter dont be fella
I agree with everything especially Saveas blunder but with all that said there was most definitely a refereeing howler (on FT) that cost us the game
Not dumb or laughable. The last time time we played Australia they beat us over there and the game before that in Dundein, we only tipped them up in the last minute.
Dont be silly, its an 80 minute, there are many ways to win, one is exerting so much pressure on the opposition the commit a foul, your fair reward is a penalty. The opportunity was denied.
you have some crazy logic dude
The only reason the All Blacks are $1.19 is the bookies are too afraid to frame an honest market. If the game was played 100 times the bookies are stating that the All Blacks should win 84.3 of them and anyone with half a brain would know that based on the 161 test matches played, Australia have a 31.07% chance of winning - that is the 1 implied probability. So for the less educated on here who believe that the TAB odds are indicative of honest favouritism think again. And dont forget, these crooks have framed their markets to their advantage and only want to give you as little of their money as possible for any All Blacks victory. The 1 value is all with Australia as far as betting is concerned and the All Blacks are way over the odds and not a value bet at all. If betting on this game I know where my $100 would be going.
Wallabies are a better chance than 1.19. Cheika & Thorn have installed some real steel and the raw material is there with Coleman,Rodda & Arnold. Previously, the aussies didnt have any decent locks since Eales. When he was there they were regular winners.Expect forward battle to be quite even, but with Pocock giving an edge in fetching. In the backs they have weaknesses at centre (injuries) and left wing (defence) and are heavily reliant on Beale & Folau on attack.
Pete Samu came off the bench in the final...
Theyre better because of the coach.
Thanks for the laugh ha ha! Theyre better because they all have a stronger individual work ethic and are mostly naturals at working in a team and mostly level-headed, hence why they are better. Both teams have awful coaches. You could coach the All Blacks and I guarantee that youd be receiving the same compliments as Shag because the results wouldnt be any different.
Look at samu. A wallaby who cant make the best match day 23 for one of of our super rugby sides. We should put 30points + on them.