Info message
Successful operation message
Warning message
Error message

Shell Be Right

134 comments · +3,333 / −824 · rank #243 of 40,276

Many folk today will agree as they look back on the election campaigns that Ms Ardern told multiple untruths. These are lies. For evidence, look to broken promises on matters earnestly vowed. Doctors visits, trees, housing and poverty. There is plenty of glib spin about a coalition agreement changing the agenda but nevertheless breaking vows means those promises were lies. Ardern never qualified her vows. She even lied about her lying.Shouldnt we now be shown the coalition agreement that is instrumental in Cabinet?Next election I want a prospectus type manifesto from all representatives so they are not so casual with truth before elections. Subsequent performance can be assessed and debated. Maybe there might even be fines for political parties for breaches in advertising!

+315−53

Criminal justice presents two main factors - the offender and the victim. Victims do not receive the same depth of consideration as the offenders. Always the main focus turns to offenders whilst victims become marginalised.And then there are potential victims - those who suffer when offenders are not managed appropriately.Before we start focusing on forgiveness and kindness, all so very laudible, our first responsibility is justice for victims and safety for the community.

+243−14

Mr Maxwell, before you judge, step into the shoes of the victims. There are more victims affected than there are crims brought to justice. Try being on the receiving end of burglary, assault and other low conduct. Crime victims are prolific. Where is their voice? They did not deserve their misfortune and they do not deserve to be so disregarded today.

+84−5

Get rid of list MPs. If all had to be voted in by an electorate the natural selection process would ensure realistic and acceptable candidates come through. The House of Representatives should be open only to representatives of electorates. Furthermore, lists are undemocratic. List MPs represent nothing but the gravy train of mmp.

+75−6

Unfortunate approach. The attitudes behind such marketing are exactly those that lead to poor relationships between tenant and owner. Such tenancies are those that end in conflict and expense. Proof of the need to regulate and train property management staff.

+73−6

Try a simpler analysis. Ms Ardern cannot lead. She lacks good leadership skills and attributes. She has failed to motivate her team to solve. There is no drive or cohesion. She steals the lime-light from senior team members. She avoids problems, leaving others to find answers. Ardern is everything that is disrespected in those examples of typical leaders or managers who attract universal disdain. After all, what special qualities can be truly admired when studying Ms Ardern? Where are her unique contributions? To find an answer, look no further than child poverty, Arderns pet theme. Nothing done. Nothing coming. No change. Lots of gas.

+72−10

Commercial leaders will need more than a speech from the Ms Ardern Labour coalition. Commerce will be seeking motivational and inspirational assurances from a qualified, authoritative leader. If there is a magic theory, it needs to be shared and sold. Business will not be persuaded on news that Ms Ardern is proud of what is being achieved. Commerce will be looking for arguments of substance. That has been rather short in much of Ms Arderns coalition announcements to date.

+67−10

More vows to be made. More proclamations of intent. Saying about what is going to come. Many will see more broken promises ahead. But the main concern is that Ms Ardern has no credentials, no credibility, no qualifications to be able to authoritatively act as the messiah of commerce. Perhaps she is going to create a working party of business leaders and commercial experts.

+54−3

The electoral promises have been redefined by Ms Ardern who now asks voters to wait for 30 yrs for her labour coalition to deliver. Was she elected for 30 years? Voters want to know what the Ardern labour coalition will actually deliver within the term of office they have been elected and for which they earnestly vowed their unqualified promises.Doctors visits, houses, trees and the like. Exactly how many poor children have been identified and assisted? Or will they be grown up before even the policies are in place.The first family needs to walk the talk by giving 5% of their income to selected children in need. ... Or is there no real poverty?

+51−1

There will be some ratepayers on fixed incomes who will be frightened over the prospect of the rises indicated. But maybe they can skip doctors visits and buy fewer vegetables. For such folk, where will this eventually lead? Remember, most people do end up on fixed incomes. Rates must be realistic and fair.

+47−1

An excellent indicator of the commitment to progress pervading the Ardern Coalition. You can do so much when you are away from your desk and distant from critical team members. Perhaps this should become known as the Ardern Achievement Attitude for Accomplished Leadership.

+49−6

The tape should be available to all involved in corroborating respective claims but it is indecent to publish a private conversation never intended for the public domain. Use the evidence, yes, but broadcasting quite personal comments is gross. I feel very much for those suffering the collateral damage. Shame on the media responsible.

+63−20

Its simple. The Ardern labour coalition is firmly business unfriendly. Their mantra on election was clearly expressed as capitalism having failed the country and that a reset was in order. Under Ms Arderns direction there has been an absence of genuine business empathy for her almost 12 month term of office. Trouble is they are only now realising they have painted themselves into a corner. Amazingly, Ms Ardern has failed as their leader to even get them on the same song-sheet.

+44−6

The Ardern coalition carefully design their statements to be imprecise and generalized. Very handy to compare the more substantive comments as reported. Imperative now for the coalition to persuade the nation with more objective facts and findings to demonstrate the wisdom of their yet to be specified exact roadmaps for achieving the major goals.

+37−2

Get off the fad wagon and listen to the real science. Glyphosate is a fantastic and safe tool which leaves the environment in much better condition than many alternatives. Do we go back to burning off? Smothering increases green house gases. Tilling and scraping uses energy that increases carbon footprints - even when done by hand because humans need fuel too!Given an audience, fadists can present the sophistry to justify their personal dogma.

+34−0

The electoral promises have been redefined by Ms Ardern who now asks voters to wait for 30 yrs for her labour coalition to deliver. Was she elected for 30 years? Voters want to know what the Ardern labour coalition will actually deliver within the term of office they have been elected and for which they earnestly vowed their unqualified promises.Doctors visits, houses, trees and the like. Exactly how many poor children have been identified and assisted? Or will they be grown up before even the policies are in place.The first family needs to walk the talk by giving 5% of their income to selected children in need. ... Or is their no real poverty.

+37−4

Deeply saddening to read. It reminds me yet again how much hardship is endured by pensioner couples who have no other income. The couple living near me have had to put off replacement hearing aids for him, one has broken glasses frames, medical expenses eat into any spare cash and they have to be so frugal. No trips, no shows, they live in real poverty as per the recognised definition. Why not drop the taxation on their meagre income?Maybe we are seeing a good case for making the first $20k income as tax free for all folk?

+35−3

Ms Arderns Labour coalition have promised increased productivity but enacted law that reduces productivity through all sectors. Commercial leaders must now budget for increased payroll costs arising from domestic violence leave legislation. The increased cost is not balanced by increases in production. Ms Ardern has already made it harder for business to improve productivity as she suggests. She needs to lead by walking the talk.

+40−10

Parliament that we know today had nothing to do with that fighting. The logic seeking a memorial for skirmishes prior to the constitutional creation of our own independent country is the same as seeking a memorial for, say, the battles of Hastings or Waterloo.Besides, this does nothing to raise the model of how Maori and Europeans should get on today. Finally, these events were not civil war such as the wars of The Roses or American Union / Confederacy conflicts. Really, it was an unfortunate part of colonisation in a time long past. Lets look to the future. Stop dredging up tumult.

+35−5

There is no current political leadership. Ms Ardern might be in charge of her labour coalition but she is herself a follower. She trots after the fashionable or populist issues, steals lime-light, leans with the crowd, selfies with children and trends with how she sees public opinion. This is a following leader. We need a leading leader. In fact, there is no evidence that Ardern has motivated and sparked a cohesive team who universally promote their common goals. There is no corporate energy driving towards strong shared vision for the country. Government needs a leader.

+37−7

The arrangements for role transition strongly indicate an absence of trust and disregard for the need to give good notice about who is in charge and when.This is not a sign of confident, enlightened leadership.The public is slowly beginning to question the dynamics of our present cabinet. How effective is Ms Ardern in her chief role as team builder? This news is troubling.

+41−13

Transparency was another pre-election vow. What harm can come of data reporting? Ms Ardern also vowed no lies. Promises discarded like breadcrumbs from Gretel breeds distrust and a climate of political dishonesty. The Ardern coalition has to communicate the detail of its implementation plans and realistic roadmaps towards achieving the few promises left on the table. So in health, whats to be done? Not whats to be undone.

+35−7

Of course there are social issues that must be addressed. But they are unrelated to justice. When looking at any specific instance of crime we need to focus on the act, the victims, the damage and the offender. Lets fix society but meantime lets note that criminals ate very happy to offend - they do so by choice. We need to remove them from doing the harm they breed.Does the elderly lady victim experience 5 months less of harm because the offender has some relationship with Treaty wrongs? Justice is needed for victims, too.

+29−3

Those who support Gary should firmly express their views to the Ministry of Education. Please! They are the ones forcing schools to act as they do. Spare a thought for those who have to implement the regulations imposed upon them. Society needs to clearly declare its wishes to guide Wellington policy.

+29−5

We can question the scientific competence of any official who choses to use such subjective and uncalibrated comments. Just exactly what is the measure of pig crate? Clearly not a rational person. And how come the scientist is so familiar with the attributes of said accommodation? Sounds like a bit of a sow.

+27−5

This is a routine and overdue expense that is not remarkable. Self evident maintenance within our education system is a necessity that is not especially newsworthy.When is Ms Ardern and her labour coalition going to announce some significant, creative initiative involving major capital to revive and stimulate the economy and to secure good jobs?And instead of millions on military enquiries, Pike and other political spending, why not divert that money plus more and get on with visible action regarding the reported poverty?

+24−5

Has Ms Ardern been upskilled in how to select for high level positions. She has no real experience and that shows in her appointments to date. Worse, she demonstrates no leadership in developing her team and cultivating improvement.The Curran failure is Arderns failure. Let us hope that with a bit of leadership training, Ardern can be more responsible for her team culture and offer more support and example toj her new appointees.

+19−1

Confidence drops when uncertainty reigns. The Ardern labour coalition has failed to provide assured, informed and supportive leadership regarding its policies for business. There is still no firm direction and too many working parties fiddling with too many possibilities. How can business confidently invest in the face of so many unknowns? The loss of confidence arises from lack of enlightened leadership and direction as Ms Ardern and Labour wait for solutions to be passed to them. They claimed to have the answers and the roadmap last year. So when will Ms Arderns Labour coalition lead, direct and manage?

+26−8

Its all to do with capability. Great promises and fantastic paper policy. But where is the determined and powerful leadership and policy management necessary to actually achieve the dream? Thats where the Ardern coalition is bereft of talent. The solution can only come from the top. Or is Labours approach mimicking a wandering stray dog aimlessly going from lamp-post to lamp-post?

+19−2

Yes, Mr Wagstaff. And ostriches do this too. Head in sand. We dont like what were seeing so lets just turn and look somewhere else. Meanwhile, would you advise business owners investing their family future when they feel considerable unease within their business climate? How about putting your own money, all of it, behind your own thesis. Lead by example. Buy your own little factory. And gain all those fantastic rewards that are being promised.

+28−13

The writer speculates without foundation. Visitors will accept that domestic users have rights as long-term taxpaying supporters of the infrastructure. Charge tourists double and more. If the market is strong, heavy charging will provide the same revenue for fewer tourists. It will make the tracks more valuable to those overseas. And yes, domestic users get priority.

+15−0

In immigration, its plain they did an appalling job. Ministerial immigration decisions cannot be sloppy. In admitting shortcomings, the failure to also offer resignation shows an absence of honour and weakness of character that provokes derision. Whether the leader accepts the offer would be a matter for Labour. Most voters like to hope that their political leaders will exemplify the values and virtues the nation respects. Rather than virtue signalling and âreading between the linesâ, we trust the leadership to actively encourage honourable and dignified conduct.

+21−6

Bank statements are private and give much more information than what is actually needed. Credit checks are already common place and should satisfy questions about whether a tenant pays their bills.Property managers absolutely should be registered and qualified. They have to be trustworthy in all of their dealings with tenants and owners. There are too many questionable individuals in the game. Decent training will arm them with skills in assessing tenants without needing to pry uncomfortably into private matters.

+19−5

Low end tourism is low end business and offers this country low end value. Confine the numbers to high end travellers and the reduced costs are then comfortably covered by the decent returns to be had from focussing on premium class visitors.The writer makes no mention of the medical costs covered by DHBs when economy class visitors go so far as to backpack their hospital and health needs whilst they come to pillage our beauty and our culture on the cheap.

+24−10

Voters not supportive of the labour coalition leader should at least be able to expect Ms Ardern to responsibly promote and represent the nation in every context. Especially so when overseas. How many voters feel that unwed mothers accompanied by boyfriends and illegitimate infants are reasonably representative of contemporary New Zealand society? How many are confident that radical, communist leanings will not impede the representation of this countrys middle ground?How many dislike the impropriety of boyfriends included in âspouse programmesâ? Maybe political junkets are similar to touring sports teams with WAGs. Or is there supposed to be more formality and respect?Glittering, magical stardust? Rather, a thick cloud of bull dust.

+46−34

I have to correct the statement that half a lifetime ago Maori were beaten for their language and tikanga. That is rubbish. Almost 40 years ago corporal punishment was abolished in all schools. But punishment for Maori culture was absolutely unheard of except for the generation well before that abolition and who had attended Native Schools. Check to see when the last one closed. Half a lifetime ago? Whoever has been passing you such rubbish has been indoctrinating you with nonsense. Officially, particularly in education, Maori has been valued and celebrated for a generous full human lifetime in NZ.

+15−3

Republicans throughout USA would denounce this misapplication of the term. Ms Ardern would be better defined as anti-monarchist. Of course, given the prominence of certain photographs displayed in her office early in her term, she could more properly be labelled as a communist.

+14−2

The debating chamber is just that. Written questions and systemic gagging devices erode democratic process which is vital in this country because we have only one house. Behaviour needs to be moderated and debating standards lifted. But attempts to move further away from free speech and spoken enquiry will move us one step closer to totalitarianism in the absence of an upper house.

+14−3

Ms Ardern must attend to child poverty as she promised. Or is it solved? Or does it exist? Ms Arderns labour coalition has to fix local problems first. Unless they have run out if ideas. What direct steps have been taken to solve the issues she highlighted. Words are not actions.

+14−3

The government vowed last year that it would listen and consult. They vowed transparency. Those highly appealing promises attracted votes. Many in the business community see such broken promises as representative of an untrustworthy regime. To repair the relationship, government has to earn trust. Are they going about that task in an effective manner?

+12−2

Youd think someone had committed genocide with this commotion. Put the alleged wrongs into perspective. There are far worse and more horrific transgressions elsewhere that deserve such manufactured outrage. Nevertheless, we do need to spare a thought for the people of Botany. Is this what the House of Representatives should be all about? Clearly there are too many MPs in parliament and they disregard their first duty.

+13−3

This would fund some child poverty projects and help with nurses and teachers. Many who voted for Ms Ardern would not have dreamed she would waste such money setting up an establishment looking into the establishment.

+13−3

The overall school curriculum statement already provides for compulsion. Schools are expected to deliver at a level appropriate to community.Greens need to be honest. Explain what is wrong with present regulation. Detail problems. Specify new policy. And see the average person will agree.

+11−1

This issue represents the best example of sincere specific vows pre-election now represented as hopes. The breach of trust entailed in this rephrasing thoughout the Ardern coalition exposes the widespread insincerity which is being led by Ms Ardern. The nation expects her strong leadership in driving through concerted implementation plans to turn the lies into truth.

+14−4

There are many Kiwis who regard graffiti as vandalism. It is not an expression of free speech. It always costs the property owner. And it wrecks visual amenity for those who pass by within the community.Views should be expressed legally and appropriately - thats free speech.

+12−2

Difficult to see teachers being offered a package which they might find agreeable. The Ardern labour coalition seems short of resources to fund even basic election promises such as doctors visits. Even the mental health schools workers are not yet visible in Canterbury schools. And what resources have been directed towards deprived children as fake-promised by Ms Arden in her proclamations on child poverty? If money is available for teachers, why have the election promises not been honoured?

+18−9

And none of these activities contribute to our economy. They are a net burden. Eventually all of this cost is finally paid by consumers, rate-payers and tax payers. Yes, you and me. And for a better world? An excellent argument for folk to become more stridently change-resistent.

+12−3

Let us respect the decision by many successive governments to allow the matter to rest. Raising these events after so many years does nothing to bring our nation together. Worse, looking now with rose tinted spectacles means we are in danger of over romanticising the thing. What is there to celebrate when two of our countys present major ethnic groups got into killing one another? Leave it alone, Greens. We have moved on.

+8−0

How about requiring the tax to be returned by the service stations, just like GST? By keeping the fuel companies out of regional tax, they will be unable to spread the cost to other regions. And how about dumping the tax altogether? Thanks Labour for introducing this sick idea in the first place. Next theyll be taxing condoms.

+7−1

We have a large resource of trained teachers in early retirement. Highly experienced. Kiwis. Just change a few rules and many can be attracted back on reduced hours. Excellent proficient teachers teamed up to share the load would love to work for reduced hours. Just need to remove some of the recent rules about registration and the like. Better to have older Kiwi teachers than less experienced immigrants.

+5−0

Will these calls fall on deaf ears? It was Arderns Labour that removed property management from the then new RE controls when they brought in the now existing environment. Perhaps Labour MPs have too many rented properties of their own? Perhaps Ms Ardern is too busy making appearances of solving child poverty so there is no time to solve the issues that have emerged since Labour last regulated the real estate sector?

+10−5

When business has increased payroll costs then productivity takes a deeper dive when production or sales remain the same. Ms Ardern has reduced productivity with the additional leave entitlements that must be paid by business. Union intrusion will also reduce productivity when staff are diverted from their work. So employers are justifiably worried. Hence confidence erosion.Ms Ardern needs to truly lead business to restore their confidence in the future.

+4−0

Their choice. Fine. But coupling the story with healthiest kid ... why make it a competition? There are some pretty good reasons for sticking to traditional mixed diets, as well. As for me, anything goes.

+7−3

No. Entry to NZ requires a good standard of communication skill. That should be better policed. How can new immigrants truly adapt to our culture and adopt our way of life without ensuring proficiency in English. They have no right to insist on changing our culture by requiring the costs of foreign language materials at election. Rate payers again carry the burden.

+6−2

Notice how property management businesses cite their real estate agent numbers in adverts and documentation, giving an impression of professional standing? Registration and qualification is now an absolute necessity to protect tenants and owners. Of course, owners dealing directly with their tenants can skip the requirement because they have a vested interest in maintenance and excellent tenant relationships. The problems emerge with the middle-weasel.

+3−0

Do NZ voters go for appearance, likes, vague mission statements and superficial acceptability or are they concerned with specific policy, capable solutions, expertise and substance? Im hoping its the latter. If so, Mr Bridges just needs to forget the look, organize his caucus to say what they stand for and get busy selling it.

+7−4

Hipkins is keen to review and redesign the Labour Tomorrows Schools system. He is relying on educators to contribute. As with all education change, this will mean more work for teachers. So instead of striking, come on educators, work together for once and withdraw all contibutions and work on Hipkins hobby project. Have nothing to do with any part of it until you are satisfied with conditions. This will mean that some big-ego educators will need to act more professionally in harmony with their peers. Cant see that happening. Thats why they are so poorly paid.

+2−0

The Human Rights Act has been a welcome tool towards improving our social condition. But it was never intended to be a device to enslave or coerce others who may wish to politely confine themselves to living within their own sincerely held beliefs. What harm if some folk wish to retain conservative or traditional views as long as those folk avoid demanding that the world be like them? Kiwis have always followed the mantra of live and let live. This would make an interesting test case on a constitutional principle. Liberty regarding belief and philosophy is just as important as protecting against unjustified discrimination.

+7−5

This does not have to be difficult. Lift the rates and baselines whilst retaining the sanctions. For many years the payment rates have been insufficient across the board. Abatement rates also need major adjustment. But control must remain to limit those with the wrong attitudes to this necessary state assistance.

+3−1

That is correct. But they do not deny treatment to those in need. Take a look at their annual reports which indicate such patients aggregate costs and bad debts in the order of millions.

+2−0

The Ardern coalition vowed conversations and listening. Now it seems theyll converse only with selected, acceptable constituents. That means listening only to those who reflect current, appropriate thinking. Even though Ms Ardern solemnly insisted last year she would never lie, how can these breaches of trust strengthen public support for the Ardern coalition?

+6−4